Written by: Shawn C
AAR: Pat McNamara 2-Day Mil/LE T.A.P.S. Class - Oct 11-12, 2011 - Ottumwa, IA
AAR Written by Shawn C.;
Grey Group Training hosted a 2 Day TAPS class in Ottumwa, IA. The weather was in the 70’s and overcast on TD1 and Rain for most of TD2. This was a MIL/LEO restricted class due to the range.

Pat started the class with why he was there and why he believes in what he is teaching. He described the class as “agents of correction” and once considered himself this nation’s “Batman” and now we as first responders are his “Batman” and he requires the best out of us. He strongly believes in what he is telling us and after meeting him and training with him, this forms the philosophy for everything that he does and transcends the use of firearms.
He explained the methodology of TAPS as “ Through coaching we will demonstrate a method of training that is safe, efficient and effective. It is combat relevant and encourages a continuous thought process and demands accountability.” He stated this without notes. As long as this was kept at the forefront of your mind and set as a goal to accomplish throughout the course, then everything that Pat taught, made perfect sense. He defined performance as doing what you can with what you have. He stated that the” mind navigates the body” and further broke it down to how you think will determine how you perform.
I found a lot of these concepts right out of the mental performance training books for elite athletes and applied to an endeavor where life and death and hangs in the balance. These are some esoteric concepts that a lot of instructors just don’t cover. Pat not only embraces these concepts but exudes them and expects the same out of you and they come directly from his experience.
He explained some concepts that run parallel with others from the same community. One example is that he believes all marksmanship is to be considered basic with no such thing as “advanced marksmanship.” He clarified that the difference lies in performing basic marksmanship, at a high level. I have heard this before from an instructor who was in the same unit.
These were just a few of the gems that he provided during this initial brief. I could have left after this and felt I got my monies worth for the class. It was by design that he gave this “lecture” before his safety brief.
I won’t cover all of the rules in his safety brief except to say that they are a distinct variation of the common 4 rules that everyone knows and that we would not “pay lip service” to the briefing. One example is his Rule 3, “ Never intentionally cover anything with the muzzle of your weapon system that you are not willing to destroy.” He explained the reason for the word “intentional” inserted into that rule is “that shit happens in combat.” Pat further explained that he considers these rules to be tactical in nature which covers the administrative component of the rules.
Pat described himself as not being a “gun guy” but someone who found out what works over time. Pat covered some maintenance tips on the AR platform. I have always been told to keep the bore of your AR dry, keeping lube out of it. I never knew the reason why until Pat explained that as the round travels down the bore of a wet barrel it could cause “hydrostatic pitting” over time. He explained a way to check the sharpness of the extractor is to pull it along the back of your forearm and if it leaves two, white parallel lines then you are good to go.
We performed combat checks of our rifles, “gassed up our deathsticks” and headed out to start Basic Rifle Marksmanship by zeroing our rifles. Pat prefers the 50-200yd zero for irons or CCOs and a 100 yard zero for ACOGs to take advantage of the BDC of the reticule. He also believes in shooting 5 round groups for zeroing to eliminate the one or two “ooops” that may occur. He asked the question “If the rifle is zeroed, is it zeroed?” Some offered that the rifle is only zeroed to the individual. Pat said that if it is zeroed then it is mechanically zeroed and not dependent on the shooter. He said that he has had this argument throughout his career and some will believe it and others will not. I think that trend continued with this class. I have had my current duty rifle combo now for about a year and a half and I have gotten the best zero to date at this class.
We fired zeroing groups for awhile. Pat talked about metacognition and how it applies to BRM. He talked about firing with both eyes open vs. one eyed closed.

We fired Pat’s 400 point aggregate which is 10 rounds standing, 10 rounds kneeling, 10 rounds sitting and 10 rounds prone on a SR1 target at 50 yards. Pat gave us suggestions in how to make each position more stable to fire in. And no, he did not demo “freakshow” prone, thank god. We shot this a couple times and with variations of time restraints in various positions.
This took us to lunch. During lunch, Pat was asked about a night shoot. He asked if guys had brought their NODS and lasers. He was told no. He said that what would be the point. He said that night fire techniques with white light boil down to the same techniques during the day with a flashlight. He said that every knows how to light, shoot, light off moHe offered suggestions on white light placement on the carbine and how to manipulate it.
I also had a chance to shoot Pat’s 1911 that was built by a current Unit armorer. It has adjustable BoMars, tungsten full length guide rod and an extended magazine release. It did not immediately explode upon firing and made short work of 50 yard support hand only firing on a 10” piece of steel.
After lunch, Pat talked a little about the sequence of firing with the AR and when broken down can be used to diagnose problems with the weapon system.
We shot a 500 point aggregate drill that Pat told us is only the 2nd time he has shot it during the class and it was different than the 1st time he ran it. It is a variation of a 500 point aggregate pistol drill that we would not shoot until tomorrow. It consists of 10 rounds standing, no time limit, 10 rounds standing, support side, no time limit, 10 rounds standing, 20 seconds, 10 rounds from standing to kneeling, 20 seconds, 10 rounds standing to sitting, 20 seconds at 50 yards on a SR1 target, all scoring rings in play. Pat sets a personal goal of all rounds in the black, 9 ring and in and for himself considers anything in the white are misses or “junebugs.”
Pat said that no one can shoot BRM all day long, so he switched gears for us and we started shooting closer with multiple shots and within our “home” meaning fire the sequence as fast as we can still get hits in the black.

After a few of these drills, Pat pulled us off the line and went into rant mode. This was the accountability portion of the course. He called out several of us who were not doing certain things and were doing unnecessary things. Pat is big into follow-through after firing your last shot. He likes to have you “check your work through your sights” and if necessary, be in a position to have the sights still on the threat and slack taken out of the trigger to deliver follow-up shots if the threat requires so. He also is against coming off the target by depressing your muzzle and scanning left to right. He referred to this as “theatrics” and explained where it came from. He was okay with it as long as you “checked your work through your sights” first. He says that too many of us were just pulling our gun out of the fight at that point. He told us that if we were to continue doing this that we should do everyone a favor and yell out “ I quit.”
This was a great part of the course and it is by design. Without this critical feedback, you are just firing blindly through the course and doing what it is you have always done which defeats the purpose of going to training in the first place. This was in keeping with what Pat explained during the initial lecture in regards to the goals for this course. Personally, I was diggin it.
This took us to the end of TD1. The mark of a great instructor is to know when to call it quits. Pat had told us that we would be doing certain drills towards the latter half of the afternoon. We did not get to these, because the class as a whole had reached the saturation point to process any more information. Pat knew this and knew it would be a waste of ammo to continue. We huddled up and he reviewed what we did and how it related to the goals he had set forth at the beginning of the course. He gave us a preview of what he wanted to accomplish for TD2 then we were finished for the day. “Ready, ready, break.”
Pat has an endless amount of energy, but is not scatterbrain or does he allow it to overcome his ability to stay focused and on task. I have a feeling that this is his approach to pretty much everything that he sets out to accomplish in his life. This is one of the traits of highly successful people and gave an indication of what Pat is about. He was extremely polite and conducted himself as a gentleman. He was never abrasive or gruff when explaining concepts. He treated you like an adult who was there to participate in adult learning. He would give himself to all of the students and everyone received personal attention to better their performance. Pat’s level of professionalism is on par with only a select few who do this for a living. He is also an extremely entertaining dude.

Pat met the class for dinner at a local restaurant the night of TD1.
TD2 started with a “torrential downpour.” Pat told us that most times it is counter-productive to try and train in these types of conditions. He said if it is sprinkling then that’s a different story. So Pat discussed what we would be trying to accomplish during the day. He reviewed his “tactical” rules of firearms safety and was as passionate about it as he was on TD1. He discussed why it is as important to be as good with your pistol as your carbine because of the event of your “primary” going down your pistol now becomes your “primary.” He discussed why he prefers to manipulate the slide by using the slingshot method vs. the overhand grip method and it boils down towards your hand getting caught in the ejection port or your small fingers drifting in front of the muzzle. He stated that pistol accuracy comes down to simply front sight focus and trigger control. He also believes in incorporating a sidestep to the left on the draw stroke or a reload.
The rain let up a little bit so we headed out to do some drills. We started with bulls eye work at 10 yards to confirm where our pistols were hitting and to sharpen up on our trigger control. We shot from both weapon hand only and support hand only. Again typical standard bulls eye work. We started working on the draw stroke and then doing it on the timer. Pat feels that going straight up and down into and drawing the gun makes it consistent no matter what the type of holster that is being used. He is also a proponent of slowing down the last part of the press-out to settle the sights.
He introduced us to a drill that he called “Pick your Poison.” It involved selecting the impact area for all of your rounds being either the A, C or D zone of an IPSC target. You fire a total of 30 rounds; 10 from the 25yd line both hands, 10 from the 20 weapon hand only and 10 from the 15yd line, support hand only. Any round outside of the A Zone is 5pts, C zone is 4pts and D zone is 3pts. You compete against everyone else on the line so you have to not only decide which scoring zone to chose based on your ability to hit it but also on your teammates ability to hit their selected zones.
We shot this for the “World Pick your Poison Championship.” This took us to lunch.
After lunch we started with the carbine. We had access to vehicles that we could shoot from ( for some to shoot into). Pat started off the afternoon discussing reloads. After discussing when it is appropriate to reload your carbine, he taught this sequence for reloading your carbine. Seek cover, verbalize, engage safety, drop empty magazine, “Center line sweep, index finger guide” to access your fresh magazine, and “Format Focal Shift.” He explained that the “Format Focal Shift” allows your focus to be shifted downrange to the fight so you are “oriented” to the fight which will allow you to get back into the fight, quicker. He also took this time to discuss how to use the vehicle as cover. Some of it is different then what is being taught through PowerPoint or by certain agencies but it is based on his experience and when he explains it his technique makes sense. Pat also advocates that if moving behind cover that you will need to emerge from cover in a different location, always.
We went back to the pistol and shot a 500 point aggregate which consisted of 10 rounds standing, 20 seconds for 5 rounds from the holster x2, 10 seconds for 5 rounds from the holster x2, 10 rounds weapon hand only, 10 rounds support hand only all from 20 yards on a SR-1 bulls eye. This was the last pistol accuracy drill that we did for the course.
Pat brought us back to the carbine to discuss transitioning from the rifle to the pistol. He said that he has timed it out with a pro timer and has reached the conclusion that transitioning to the pistol is quicker than reloading the rifle. He said that the difference could be measured in “nano-seconds” but that a gunfight could be over in nano-seconds. We shot the transition drill by loading 3 rounds into the rifle mags. He believes that setting it up with only one round in the rifle is negligent and reinforces a bad habit. His preferred transition technique is “ When your gun doesn’t work anymore, draw and shoot your pistol.” Nothing more, nothing less. He also reminded us that the transition would be a good opportunity to incorporate a side step to the left. Pat asked the question of when is it appropriate to transition. He replied with when it is a tactical necessity or catastrophic failure. We did a combo drill of firing 3 rounds out of the rifle, put weapon on safe, conduct mag change, fire 3 rounds, transition to pistol and fire 3 rds.
We ran the transition drill for awhile then set-up for the final exercise which was a variation of Pat’s “Scrambler” drill. Because we had vehicles that we could shoot from, he set it up with the vehicles being utilized as barricades. 2 very small pieces of rifle steel were set-up at 50 yards, with one piece of pistol steel and an IPSC target set closer. You loaded 3 rounds into your rifle mag. You had to run approximately 20 yards to one of the vehicles and engage both pieces of rifle steel with 2 hits. One piece of steel had to be engaged from one of the vehicles and the other piece of steel had to be engaged from the other vehicle. Reloads had to be conducted from behind cover and the rifle had to be placed on safe during reload or moving. You had to verbalize your movement. After the rifle steel is engaged, if you had remaining rifle rounds you could fire them into the IPSC A-Zone for a 1 second per shot reduction in your overall time. Once your rifle is empty, transition to your pistol and engage the pistol steel with 5 hits. This stops the clock.
It was a pretty comprehensive drill consisting of many components that needed to be done correctly to get a “go” on the drill.

This wrapped up the course. Pat reviewed what we completed over the past 2 days and again reinforced what the purpose of TAPS was and what we did to accomplish it.
To call Pat an “instructor” I don’t feel would be an accurate description. His knowledge base and experience in deadly force engagements is endless. He knows what is important and what is not in getting you to do the things that you would need to do to “win” a deadly force engagement. What he gives you in this course transcends the mechanical and will serve you well no matter what your training endeavors may be. Pat is focused on winning, period. He sets the bar for you to achieve by example. It is personified not only in what he teaches but also in everything that he does. Pat seems to have a purpose in everything he does. He is able to quickly analyze what each individual shooter is doing wrong and offer advice on what they need to do to fix it. Pat stood out in the rain with everyone else. He pasted and moved targets and during the last exercise was encouraging guys to keep shooting the “Scrambler” over and over again even though dudes were physically and mentally exhausted. I don’t think you could ask more out of an instructor. No strike that. As corny as it sounds, I think the more accurate description of what Pat is would be “Coach.”
As clichéd as it has become, I will say that you a definitely missing a piece of the pie if you do not attend a Pat Mcnamara course.